www.carrozzieri-italiani.com

The ultimate italian coachbuilder site

The story of Ghia – part 2

The revolution by Savonuzzi

The succession of prototypes made on behalf of Chrysler undoubtedly influenced the 1951 project by Piero Dusio, patron of Cisitalia, to try to ride the wave of the American success of the berlinetta 202. This study for a new coupe on Mercury mechanics, baptized 808 XF, was entrusted to Savonuzzi, while Ghia took care of the preparation. The result was a very sober, elegant and modern car, in whose lines the similarities with the sports cars defined by Virgil Exner were evident. But nothing was done of that splendid car; in 1953, that experience resulted in the Cisitalia 505 DF, based on the Fiat 1900, of which ten units were produced. Ghia Serie Speciale SpA was formed in 1954, into which Ghia itself, the Monviso SpA factories and OSI SpA joined forces in the new premises in corso Unione Sovietica 75-79, formerly the headquarters of Monviso (which was entirely acquired in 1955).

The functions of technical director at Ghia were assumed by engineer Giovanni Savonuzzi. He was already well known in the car industry, after having worked in the aeronautical sector; during the war, he collaborated at Fiat with Dante Giacosa, who appointed Piero Dusio for the project of the Cisitalia D46 and the berlinettas 202. On his arrival at Ghia he contributed with new bodywork projects – some of which also for Chrysler – and above all he brought to the company new methods and refined processing techniques. When he was still an external consultant for Ghia, a project had caused a sensation: a coupé conceived for the Mille Miglia of 1953, equipped with a tubular frame and mechanical parts derived from the Alfa Romeo 1900 Sprint (four carburetor engine, 130 HP), from the Lancia Aurelia (transmission, rear axle and steering) and from the Fiat 1400 (front end), all assembled by Carlo Abarth and tuned by Virgilio Conrero.

Read more: “Ghia Supersonic

Based on that same basic approach, the new technical director devised the Supersonic model on the latest chassis of the Fiat 8V, which was presented in 1954 and later replicated with the mechanics of the Jaguar XK 120 and that of the Aston Martin DB2. The Supersonic was also proposed on the Adventurer II with De Soto mechanics, a high-level brand of the Chrysler group. Chrysler also wanted to support the Gilda project, on which Savonuzzi intended to experiment with the presence of rear fins to balance the action of the side wind in speed with respect to the center of gravity of the car. He prepared a special reduced-scale car for the wind tunnel of the Polytechnic of Turin to better define the line of the prototype, which was a huge attraction at the 1955 Turin Motor Show, where the Gilda was presented as “a body of high aerodynamic characteristics in the pursuit of profile and style“.

1955 Ghia Streamline X “Gilda”

That same year, Ghia incorporated the Carrozzeria Stabilimenti Monviso, founded ten years earlier by Alessandro Casalis for the production of custom-built cars and above all of “elaborated” cars, that is, cars of normal production to which some variations of an aesthetic nature were made, such as a different design or the rear tails or two-tone painting. With the liquidation of Monviso and the entry of Casalis to Ghia as managing director, Segre gained new large workshop rooms and specialized workers, which resulted in better management of the contracts for the orders from builders in Italy and abroad.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

With the promising slogan “exciting cars”, Chrysler exhibited at the entrance of the Chrysler Building in New York three prototypes made by Ghia for the Christmas holidays of 1955; that was the opportunity to probe the taste of local motorists with some proposals that could find confirmation in future series production. Defined not as a dream car but as an “concept car”, that is cars susceptible to real industrial development, Chrysler presents the Flight Sweep in closed and open versions, as well as the Falcon cabriolet, attracting over one and a half million visitors who were delighted in front of those harmonious machines, defined by the American press with the expression “Italian shapes”. They did not go to production, but sent a precious message to the American factory about the orientations that would mark the choices of the public in the not too distant future.

Two americans in Turin

Segre’s final agreement with the Americans to transform a small series of the Imperial – the most prestigious brand of the American group – predicted that the production cars would be sent to Turin to be disassembled, lengthened, re-designed and then offered on the overseas market under the Ghia Crown Imperial brand. All over the world they became the most sought after parade cars for the important events in which the sovereigns or the most famous characters of the time participated. The contract for their supply was renewed for nine years, from 1957 to 1965.

Ghia Imperial design sketch

In a dramatic succession of events, 1957 recorded the resignation of Giovanni Savonuzzi, called by Chrysler in the United States, as well as the new transfer of Ghia to via Agostino da Montefeltro 7, in Turin, which occurred in conjunction with the incorporation of Carrozzeria Pietro Frua and its appointment as head of the Style Office, even if the controversial authorship of the Renault Floride project – carried out by Frua but claimed by Segre within the framework of the new company organization – led the two protagonists of the affair to court. The same happened with the Volvo P1800 coupe, whose design was later claimed by the Swedish Palle Patterson and also contested by Sergio Sartorelli, who at the time worked at Ghia as head of the “future cars” design department. After Frua left the scene, stylistic design at Ghia was entrusted to Sergio Sartorelli and Sergio Coggiola, the first with a solid theoretical and academic background, the second with an extraordinary intuition in visualizing a new model with remarkable aesthetic sensitivity, despite not having a specific university preparation. Towards the end of the 1950s, the fashion for beach cars exploded, interpreted by Ghia with the Jolly models, mostly set up on bodies derived from those of the Fiat 600 and Fiat 500 series, from which the roof and the entire passenger compartment were removed, replaced by a curious awning and four wicker seats, all made in a Spartan way and with nautical-inspired details. The same formula was then adopted on the Renault 4CV platform. On behalf of the first French manufacturer, Ghia also intervened with the scarcely credible proposal of a luxury version of the R4 (1960).

Renault 4CV Jolly. Photo courtesy of Erik Fuller

The arrival in 1959 of the newly graduated architect Tom Tjaarda from the United States played an important role in the design development at Ghia. Son of a car designer (his father John designed the Lincoln Zephyr sedan in 1935, a courageous aerodynamic proposal competing with the 1934 Chrysler Airflow) with a fervent passion for the car, he developed two almost antithetical projects, the small spider Innocenti 950 (later fitted by Ghia on the chassis of the Austin Healey Sprite) and the Selene, a futuristic, advanced driving car with ample space for six people, which also enjoyed success in the Soviet Union, where it was even thought of deriving a version for taxi service. In 1961, Tjaarda also participated with Sergio Sartorelli in the definition of the Fiat Coupé 2300 project and of that for the 1300-1500 coupé, whose assembly in small series was planned at Osi (Officine Stampaggi Industriali), which acts as a structure parallel to Ghia with the function of producing special series, for which resorting to conventional assembly lines was impracticable.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Virgil Exner Junior, son of the famous Virgil who had drastically re-launched the Chrysler group cars on the US market, aspired to work in Turin at Ghia, where he enjoyed a protected image which aroused the undeniable nervousness of Tom Tjaarda, who evidently could not count on similar availability on the part of Segre. The dissent between these and Tjaarda led to the latter resigning in 1961, after very interesting formative years in Turin. The young Exner did not, however, enter the Turin Style Office as manager, although he had left an evident sign of his presence during the military stop in Germany, where he developed his engineering thesis with a futuristic car powered by a Simca engine and bodywork with exasperated aerodynamic tail fins. For his part, his father had left his prestigious position at Chrysler in 1960 to open his own design studio.

Detroit took over

At the beginning of the 1960s, Ghia’s business was based on two parallel structures, almost independent of each other. The working group led by Sergio Coggiola was dedicated to prototypes and in particular to the development of works on behalf of Chrysler, which sent the machines already stylized and accompanied by a 1: 4 scale model and related preliminary drawings. Coggiola had the task of transforming this material into a real model and then creating the prototype according to a process that involved the most appropriate solutions to translate the drawings into practice. The other working group, under the responsibility of Sergio Sartorelli, took care of the prototypes for the European manufacturers, Renault and Volkswagen in the lead, as well as customer relations and cars for various international exhibitions.

The shocking twist occurred on February 26th, 1963 with the sudden death of Luigi Segre, following an apparently trivial surgery which went wrong. His death threw into despair those who worked at Ghia, a successful company that required a strong and determined guide, for which Giacomo Gaspardo Moro, hired just a year earlier as Segre’s assistant, was perhaps unprepared.

Segre’s family began a tortuous negotiation to transfer the ownership of the company to Rafael Leonidas Trujillo, son of the deposed Dominican dictator, and at the end of the summer he arrived in Turin to visit Ghia, urged by Gaspardo Moro, who demanded his presence to plan the company’s future. His visit did not alleviate those worries, however, as Trujillo did not take care of running the business in the slightest. In such a difficult situation, the arrival on the scene of the volcanic Argentine Alejandro De Tomaso was seen as a great opportunity; his initial thrust was justified by the need to find a coachbuilder to replace Fissore, which carried out his order of the coupé Vallelunga with 1.5 liter Ford Cortina engine. Following that negotiation, relations between Ghia and De Tomaso became closer, and the latter quickly assumed the special role of superclient, the one on which the budget and the life of the company depended. Sartorelli resigned at the end of June 1963, and Sergio Coggiola aspired to inherit his functions, but at the beginning of 1966 the responsibility of the Style Office was entrusted to Giorgetto Giugiaro, veteran from the positive experiences lived at Bertone; Coggiola felt disregarded and left the company for founding his own one.

De Tomaso Vallelunga concept made by Fissore. The production model was assembled by Ghia

Within a few months, Giugiaro prepared four new models which aroused enormous interest at the Turin Motor Show, all made with the proverbial accuracy that characterized Ghia’s cars: the Maserati Ghibli, the De Tomaso Mangusta, the De Tomaso Pampero and the Fiat Vanessa set on 850 mechanics; all were the expression of one of Giugiaro’s most creative moments, especially in the case of the Maserati Ghibli coupe (4.7-liter V8 engine, 330 HP): its commercial success was so overwhelming (1280 units produced in 1967-1972) that Gaspardo Moro caressed the dream of spreading the Ghia-Maserati combination on the market as an alternative to the Pininfarina-Ferrari one in the field of high-performance grand touring berlinettas.

De Tomaso Mangusta. Photo courtesy of Artcurial

Seriously intending to buy Carrozzeria Ghia, De Tomaso convinced the two major shareholders (his brothers-in-law) of the American Rowan Controller Industries – specialized in electrical components for cars – to finance the operation, and so the company’s shares passed in 1967 from Trujillo to Rowan, together with the last shares still owned by the Segre heirs. Despite the explicit contractual conditions, which excluded De Tomaso’s involvement in the management of the company, he actually took the reins of Ghia, quarreling from the beginning with his closest collaborators, forcing them to leave their jobs.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The American Tom Tjaarda returned to direct the Style Department in 1968 and developed two valuable prototypes on Lancia mechanics: the Fulvia Competizione and the Flaminia Marica, both of very original and pleasant lines; a few months later Fiat entered the capital of Lancia and the two projects were halted.

Lancia Flaminia Marica owned by Corrado Lopresto

Lee Jaccoca, Ford manufacturer at Detroit, intended to enter the promising supercar market by acquiring Ferrari. After those negotiations failed, De Tomaso – an old friend of Jaccoca’s – received approval for the renewal of the Mangusta on the same technical scheme, but with a different bodywork, which was given the name Pantera. Tjaarda undertook the project in record time.

To meet the commitment to produce the Pantera in small series, De Tomaso broadened his prospects as an entrepreneur and bought Carrozzeria Vignale in December 1969, acquiring a modern factory where cars could be assembled in sufficient numbers to comply with the requests of the overseas market. The entry of the large American group into the capital of Ghia was therefore essential, and a press release from the Ford Motor Company dated August 3rd 1970 announced that the company had acquired 84% of the capital of Carrozzeria Ghia and Vignale in Turin from Rowan, as well as of De Tomaso Automobili in Modena. Following the Pantera, the Deauville sedan and the Longchamp coupé version made their debut in 1970-72, both aimed at competing on the European market against the prestigious Jaguars. In Detroit it was also believed that it was possible to build a customized version of the production Ford Granada, presented with the initials “De Tomaso-Granada” and “Powered by Ford”; an unattractive idea, which resulted in a clear failure.

Ghia as trim level

In the first years of Ford’s shareholding, Ghia had to look for a role within the large American group and Tom Tjaarda signed some interesting style proposals, among which the De Tomaso Zonda (1971), a classic and very refined coupé powered by a Ford V8 engine of almost 5.8 liters (350 hp).

1971 De Tomaso Zonda

In the meantime, he took on the exciting task of designing an utility car, with which Ford intended to face competition from European manufacturers in the popular car market. Initially identified as Bobcat, the new machine conceived by Tjaarda for the international market was the subject of countless revisions and updates at various Ford style centers; it was presented at the end of June 1976 with the deliberate name of Fiesta and an unprecedented front-wheel drive mechanics, base engine of 957 cm (40 HP), two-volume body, three doors, four seats, weight of 715 kg and maximum speed 130 km / h. The marketing philosophy of the Ford T was practically reinterpreted seventy years later and confirmed by the success that the new small car enjoyed worldwide.

In January 1973, De Tomaso sold his minority stake in the Turin bodywork to Ford and the management passed entirely under the control of Detroit. The management of Ghia was entrusted to the American John Head, flanked by Filippo Sapino, head of the style center that Ford Europe had in Bruino, Turin. He immediately had the difficult task of demobilizing the Bruino headquarters, whose functions were in fact absorbed by Ghia itself. Another thorny issue concerned the coexistence of Sapino and Tjaarda, both with the position of design directors. In reality the situation never degenerated because Sapino was increasingly involved by Head in the role of project manager. On the other hand, Tjaarda did not adapt to the new and cumbersome presence of Ford and soon the decision to leave the company was ripe. In fact, the Ghia design activity had completely lost its autonomy and the work had become no longer proactive, but relegated to the pure execution of the proposals received from the other Ford style centers. The Ghia brand subsequently enjoyed an extraordinary diffusion on the market, as the set-up of the most advanced models in the Ford range was identified by the double Ford Ghia emblem.

1979 Ford Probe

The Megastar prototype was exhibited at the 1977 Geneva Motor Show, considered a sort of rebirth of the legendary Turin coachbuilder; developed on a wheelbase of 2770 mm, the car exhibits a maximum height of 1240 mm and a load volume in the trunk equal to that of a conventional sedan but with a reduced overall length and also an enormous glass surface. Among the numerous other prototypes developed in Turin, the Mustela II and the Coins of 1973-74 stood out, followed in 1979 by the City Car Vignale and the generation of Ford Probes – made by Ghia on projects developed by the Ford Design Center in Detroit – as well as the Escort Brezza from 1982, the Ford Mustang Ghia Vignale and the Ford Via prototype from 1989, as well as the curious double project of the Zig and Zag vehicles on the Ford Fiesta platform, developed as part of a new technical-construction strategy based on the concept of a unified chassis; were both exhibited at the 1990 Geneva Motor Show. At the end of March 2001, Ford announced the decision to transform Ghia into an electronic design center with a staff so drastically downsized as to preclude any possibility of creating a body with a stroke of pencil, into a new entity marked by the times in which we live.

1976 Ford Fiesta Ghia advertising

Source:
01. “I Capolovori dello Stile: Ghia-Vignale” by Luciano Greggio – Ruoteclassiche

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The BMW M1 holds a unique place in automotive history. As the first production car from BMW’s Motorsport division, the M1 was intended to showcase the company’s engineering prowess and racing pedigree. However, despite its striking looks, impressive performance, and significant impact on the BMW brand, the M1’s journey was fraught with challenges, including financial turmoil, production delays, and regulatory hurdles. Today, the M division has evolved into a symbol of high-performance street cars, but the M1’s legacy remains one of both triumph and failure.

The Birth of BMW Motorsport

In 1972, BMW established its Motorsport Division, known as “M,” with the goal of advancing the brand’s competitive edge in the world of motorsports. Prior to this, BMW’s racing efforts were fragmented, with various teams involved in different categories but lacking a unified structure. This all changed when Bob Lutz, BMW’s head of sales and marketing, spearheaded the formation of BMW Motorsport. The division’s primary mission was to build competitive race cars and elevate the brand’s reputation, particularly in touring car racing.

BMW’s first major success in the motorsport arena came in 1973 with the BMW 3.0 CSL, which dominated the European Touring Car Championship. This victory cemented BMW’s position in the racing world. However, as the division grew, it became apparent that creating race cars from existing production models was unsustainable in the long run. The company needed a purpose-built race car, one that would push the boundaries of performance. This vision led to the creation of the BMW M1, a car that would become a defining symbol for BMW Motorsport.

Michelotti and the BMW Turbo Concept

Alongside the creation of the M division, BMW was developing the BMW Turbo, a concept car that would become a landmark in automotive design and technology. Designed by Paul Bracq, the Turbo E25 introduced bold new features, such as a mid-mounted engine, gullwing doors, and retractable headlights, marking a radical departure from BMW’s previous designs. The car represented a vision of the future, combining performance with cutting-edge safety features, and was intended as a technology showcase for the brand.

Initially, BMW contracted Carrozzeria Michelotti, to assemble the Turbo prototype. Giovanni Michelotti, famous for his work with a variety of automotive brands, established a 10,000-square-meter workshop dedicated to the Turbo project. Michelotti built two BMW Turbo prototypes in total, with one being showcased at the 1972 Frankfurt Motor Show. This partnership underscored BMW’s ambition for the car and its desire to create something truly revolutionary.

However, the timing of the project was unfortunate. The 1973 oil crisis caused a global economic downturn, dramatically increasing fuel prices and severely affecting the automotive industry, particularly for performance cars like the BMW Turbo. The crisis placed enormous financial strain on car manufacturers, and BMW was forced to reconsider its plans, including the costly decision to move forward with the Turbo prototype.

The Fallout and the Shift to Italdesign

As the crisis deepened, BMW was unable to fulfill its contract with Michelotti, and the planned collaboration was put on hold. Financial constraints led the company to reevaluate its spending, and resources allocated to the Turbo project were reduced. Michelotti’s specially built workshop, which had been prepared to assemble the car, remained underutilized as BMW shifted its focus.

However, the end of the oil crisis opened up new possibilities. Italdesign, the renowned design and engineering firm led by Giorgetto Giugiaro, came to BMW’s aid. In the years following the crisis, Italdesign purchased Michelotti’s workshop, which would become the production base for the BMW M1. Giugiaro’s expertise in design and engineering played a pivotal role in transforming BMW’s ambitious race car project into a road-going reality.

Giugiaro’s task was to refine the BMW Turbo E25 concept into a production car that could both meet the demands of motorsport and appeal to the consumer market. His design for the M1 retained the sharp, angular lines and futuristic profile of the Turbo, but with refined proportions to suit both racing needs and road-going practicality. The M1’s mid-engine layout, wide stance, and low roofline emphasized its racing pedigree, while its aggressive, sleek design ensured it would stand out as a supercar.

A Race Car for the Road

The BMW M1 was originally conceived as a Group 5 race car, competing against purpose-built machines like the Porsche 935. The project aimed to blend motorsport engineering with production cars, creating a race-bred vehicle that could also be sold to the public. To achieve this, BMW enlisted Lamborghini, to help with the development of the M1. Despite Lamborghini’s expertise in high-performance road cars, it lacked experience in motorsport, which ultimately led to complications during the project.

In the early stages, Lamborghini was tasked with developing the chassis and body of the M1, while BMW would provide the engine. However, Lamborghini’s financial troubles soon became apparent. The company was experiencing significant cash flow issues, and it ultimately misappropriated funds intended for the M1 project. In a dramatic turn of events, BMW was forced to reclaim the project’s components and tooling from Lamborghini, a move that involved a late-night raid to retrieve the M1’s parts. This disruption delayed the project and ultimately led BMW to take full control of the M1’s development.

The Engineering Challenges

Despite the setbacks, the M1 took shape as a highly capable performance car. The vehicle was powered by the M88 engine, a 3.5-liter, straight-six unit that produced 277 horsepower in its road-going form. This engine, derived from the racing program, provided the M1 with impressive performance, allowing it to rival other supercars of the era, such as the Lamborghini Countach and Ferrari 512 BB.

The M1 featured a mid-engine layout, which contributed to its excellent handling characteristics. The car’s design was primarily focused on its racing capabilities, making it relatively raw and unrefined for a road car. It lacked amenities such as power steering, and the cockpit was cramped, with the steering wheel offset to the right to accommodate the center-mounted engine. Despite these compromises, the M1’s performance on the road was outstanding, with acceleration and handling that earned it widespread praise from automotive journalists.

The Racing Struggles and ProCar Series

One of the most significant challenges the M1 faced was its inability to compete in mainstream racing. To homologate the M1 for Group 5 racing, BMW needed to produce 400 road cars. However, production delays meant that only 200 units were built in the first two years, preventing the car from racing in most major events.

In response, BMW created the ProCar Series, a one-make racing championship exclusively for the M1. The ProCar Series was unique in that it featured Formula One drivers competing against privateer M1 owners, creating an exciting spectacle at Formula One race weekends. Although the series generated interest and the M1 proved competitive in this setting, it was not enough to elevate the car into mainstream motorsport. Furthermore, the M1’s performance in ProCar did little to resolve its commercial issues.

Commercial Challenges and Production Woes

The M1 was also a commercial disappointment. Originally, BMW had intended to sell the M1 for around 100,000 Deutsche Marks, placing it in direct competition with supercars like the Lamborghini Countach. However, due to the disruptions caused by Lamborghini’s financial troubles and the increased cost of production, the M1’s price climbed to 113,000 Deutsche Marks. Even with this increase, the car was difficult to sell. BMW was only able to produce 399 M1s, well below the original goal of 1,000 units, making it a rare and expensive model.

Despite its high performance and exotic status, the M1 was a hard sell. Its design was too closely aligned with its racing origins, and its lack of creature comforts and high price point made it less appealing to the typical supercar buyer. Additionally, the car’s raw nature, with its lack of power steering and awkward driving position, alienated many potential customers. In the end, the M1’s commercial failure contributed to its relatively low production numbers and limited legacy as a production car.

Legacy and the Evolution of the M Division

Although the M1 was a commercial and racing disappointment, it laid the foundation for the success of BMW’s Motorsport division. The lessons learned from the M1 project helped shape future BMW M cars, starting with the iconic E30 M3. The E30 M3, developed as a more practical and accessible performance car, became a massive success in both motorsport and sales, marking the beginning of a new era for BMW M.

The M1 also solidified the link between BMW’s racing heritage and its high-performance street cars. Today, the M badge is synonymous with powerful, driver-focused vehicles, but it all traces back to the M1. The M1’s legacy is less about its financial success and more about its role in shaping the identity of BMW M as a division dedicated to performance engineering and motorsport excellence.

Conclusion

The BMW M1’s story is one of ambition, innovation, and hard lessons learned. It was a car ahead of its time, a race car designed for the road, and a symbol of BMW’s commitment to motorsport. While it never reached the commercial success BMW had hoped for, it played a crucial role in the development of the M division and set the stage for future performance cars. The M1 may not have been the financial success BMW wanted, but its influence on the brand and its impact on the automotive world cannot be overstated. Today, the M1 remains a revered classic, a testament to BMW’s racing heritage and the trials and triumphs of the M division.