carrozzieri-italiani.com

The ultimate italian coachbuilder site

The De Tomaso Mangusta, a mongoose to kill the Cobra

de tomaso mangusta

The De Tomaso Mangusta, a pivotal piece of automotive history, emerged from the visionary endeavors of Alejandro de Tomaso and his ambitious pursuit of excellence for the small Modena-based company. This Italian masterpiece, produced by De Tomaso from 1967 to 1971, traces its roots back to the influential De Tomaso P70 project in 1965, a venture that held the promise of transforming the company’s trajectory.

The origin of the DeTomaso Mangusta

Before the P70, De Tomaso had gained recognition for crafting a limited number of competition cars and approximately fifty Vallelunga coupés, each equipped with Ford engines generating around a hundred horsepower. The company, under Alejandro de Tomaso’s leadership, aspired for a significant leap forward in both quality and prominence. The P70 project, a collaboration with Carroll Shelby in 1964, represented this ambitious endeavor.

Initially intended for the 1966 Can-Am, Shelby backed the P-70 race car. Alejandro de Tomaso, in conjunction with a collaborative team sent by Shelby, was tasked with developing and building five cars. However, faced with tight deadlines, De Tomaso couldn’t fulfill the agreement. Around the same time, Carroll Shelby diverted his attention to a contract with Ford for the development of the GT-40 for Le Mans, leading to the cancellation of the P70 project in late 1965. This decision left De Tomaso offended but undeterred.

Photo courtesy of Artcurial

Undeterred, De Tomaso, with the assistance of designer Pete Brock—who remained committed to the project—continued to develop the P70 race car. Ghia was enlisted to craft a body for the single remaining vehicle. In November 1965, this car was showcased at the Turin Motor Show under the name Ghia De Tomaso Sport 5000. Although the P70 never competed in the intended Can-Am series, its existence played a crucial role in the genesis of the De Tomaso Mangusta, leaving an indelible mark on the automotive landscape. This article will delve into the intriguing journey of the Mangusta, unraveling its origins and the transformative impact of the P70 project on the destiny of this iconic Italian automobile.

The Italo-Argentinian racer and constructor, in collaboration with Ghia, unveiled a prototype to the public. Initially presented as a static model and later showcased in motion, this prototype stemmed from the designs of American designer Pete Brock. Brock, employed by the renowned American pilot and preparer Carroll Shelby’s team, contributed to the creation of this innovative project. The Italo-Argentinian visionary hoped that upon completion and demonstration of the car’s technical prowess, it would be acquired by the American team to replace their aging Lang Cooper tubular frame cars. These Lang Cooper vehicles, modified versions of the Cooper Monaco powered by a 4.7-liter Ford engine, had reached the peak of their development, prompting the need for a superior alternative in the North American racing scene.

But it was precisely in 1965 that Shelby became involved with Ford’s GT40 program, which, up to that point, had yielded disappointing results. Shelby devoted himself entirely to this new undertaking, setting aside his own cars and their related development projects. As a result, Alejandro De Tomaso found himself without the primary recipient for his new sports car and was compelled to alter his plans. He decided to shift his focus to road-going sports cars, directly challenging the likes of Ferrari and Lamborghini—brands deeply rooted in the same geographic territory where his small company had originated and grown. The Argentine entrepreneur aimed to capture market share, especially in the affluent United States.

Drawing from the experience gained with the “P70 project,” built on the technical concepts of Vallelunga and its competition derivatives, De Tomaso did not let it go to waste. Instead, he infused it into the Mangusta, a name chosen by the spirited Argentine as a retaliation against Carroll Shelby. The mongoose, capable of combating cobras on equal terms, symbolized the vehicles of the American preparer.

Photo courtesy of Artcurial

Innovative Chassis Design

In Modena’s vision, the Mangusta’s strength and primary feature were its single-beam aluminum chassis, derived from the Vallelunga designed three years earlier. Essentially the same as the P70/Sport 5000, it featured a mid-rear engine with a semi-supporting function, akin to the competition cars of the seventies. This was an innovative solution for a road-going grand tourer. Complementing the single-beam chassis were independent suspensions on all four wheels, a dual-circuit four-disc braking system, and magnesium wheels supplied by Campagnolo in 7×15″ front and 8×15″ rear sizes.

Similar to the Mangusta’s single-beam chassis, Lotus adopted a comparable solution, but the English automaker did not stress the engine as a structural element. Instead, it delegated the task of supporting the rear suspensions to extensions of the chassis. The Modena-based chassis, paired with a hefty and powerful cast iron Ford V8 engine, covered with a lightweight steel body featuring aluminum hoods and doors, exacerbated the stiffness issues previously encountered with the Vallelunga. It resulted in an unideal weight distribution of the vehicle. Attempting to alleviate this, De Tomaso replaced some components with aluminum castings, but the savings amounted to only 25 kg. To enhance dynamics, he decided to lower the engine. Unable to do so with a dry sump, due to high costs, he reduced the clutch bell diameter by fitting three small-diameter discs instead of the standard large one. However, the weight distribution remained imbalanced at 32% to the front and 68% to the rear, rendering the Mangusta’s driving dynamics uncertain and unpredictable as the adhesion limit approached—not quite reaching the standard set by its top competitors, despite its competitive power-to-weight ratio, which put it in contention with the contemporary Lamborghini Miura.

The engine, paired with a somewhat stiff 5-speed gearbox supplied by ZF, was the Ford 289 V8 with a displacement of 4.7 liters, tuned by De Tomaso to reach 306 horsepower. However, for the U.S. market, the significantly less potent Ford 302 V8, a 5-liter engine producing only 220 horsepower, was later installed in the cars. This adjustment aimed to comply with the increasingly stringent emissions regulations imposed by the U.S. federal government during that era.

Unfulfilled Potential and Italian Design Innovation

With Italian design flair, a gullwing hood, aerodynamic and stylish body, four disk brakes, and an overall sportier appearance, the Mangusta was anticipated to deliver exceptional performance, particularly given its superb suspension and mid-engine layout. However, it proved to be underdeveloped. The weight distribution ratio of 32/68 led to front-end lift during cornering, resulting in understeering. Simultaneously, the chassis frame lacked rigidity, occasionally causing oversteering. In summary, the Mangusta was unpredictable, unstable, and challenging to control. Despite its design upgrades, the Mangusta failed to outpace the Cobra, with approximately 500kg more weight and a less powerful engine.

A total of 401 units were produced, with around 150 designated for Europe, 250 for the U.S. market, and a special version equipped with a Corvette engine for Bill Mitchell, General Motors Vice President. The 1970 U.S. models, numbering 50, featured two pop-up headlights.

The body was designed by Giorgetto Giugiaro, then the chief designer at Carrozzeria Ghia in Turin. He adapted a previous rejected design for Iso Rivolta, captivating the new client, De Tomaso. The result was an extremely low-profile vehicle (only 1100 mm in height), sacrificing some interior space but achieving the right balance between elegance and aggression. It featured a massive windshield, necessitating the purchase of an air conditioner to alleviate the greenhouse effect in summer, and a split gullwing hood. Giugiaro’s design for the Mangusta incorporated flat elements, anticipating the protruding frame that encloses the grille and headlights, a solution later adopted by other manufacturers. The exterior sophistication contrasted with a particularly Spartan interior, aligning with the concept of a race car suitable for road use promoted by the manufacturer. Notably, for the U.S. market version, Giugiaro addressed the height restrictions imposed by the American Department of Transportation by fitting a single, larger, partially retractable round headlight, ensuring compliance while maintaining a distinctive aesthetic.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the De Tomaso Mangusta, born from Alejandro de Tomaso’s visionary P70 project, stands as a distinctive chapter in automotive history. Despite handling challenges, its Italian design, gullwing hood, and Ford V8 power left a lasting impression.

The Mangusta’s story extends beyond its 1967-1971 production, laying the groundwork for the De Tomaso Pantera. Introduced in the early 1970s, the Pantera refined the Mangusta’s flaws, becoming an iconic model with international success.

The transition from Mangusta to Pantera signifies De Tomaso’s resilience and innovation. Both models contribute to the enduring legacy of Italian sports cars, capturing the spirit of automotive enthusiasts. The Mangusta’s impact persists not only in its own history but also in the continued success and refinement seen in the subsequent Pantera model.

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

In this exclusive interview, Andreas Scheidl sits down with Michael Robinson, former Design Director at Bertone, to discuss the fascinating story behind the creation of the Alfa Romeo Pandion. This concept car, unveiled in 2010 to celebrate Alfa Romeo’s centenary, became an iconic blend of cutting-edge technology, bold design, and artistic innovation. Robinson shares the challenges of designing a groundbreaking prototype in just four months, the inspirations behind its unique features, and how the Pandion marked a pivotal moment in his career and for Bertone. This is the untold story of how one of the most daring concept cars of the 21st century came to life.

The Alfa Romeo Centenary

In 2009, Bertone was in a very challenging position: there were no projects, no active design team, nothing. The priority was to find an opportunity to restart creativity and the company itself. So, I decided to call a friend, Sergio Cravero, who was then the CEO of Alfa Romeo. It was early October 2009.

I said, “Hey Sergio, how’s it going?” Without hesitation, he replied, “Mike, we’d love for Bertone to design a car to celebrate Alfa Romeo’s centenary.” I was thrilled and immediately responded, “Fantastic! When would you like it?” His answer, however, left me stunned: “For the Geneva Motor Show.”

Geneva was in March, just four months away. I thought it was impossible. When I was director of the Lancia design center, it took us 24 months to develop the Dialogos concept car. I replied, “We can’t do it; four months is far too short for a prototype of this significance.” But the head of the workshop calmly reassured me: “Don’t worry, we’ll make it happen.”

I accepted the challenge and returned to the office to announce the news to the team: “We have an incredible project ahead of us! But there’s one rule: no drawing cars right away. First, we must research.”

The Importance of Research

I wanted my 30 designers to understand the essence of Alfa Romeo: what made its cars iconic, what defined a sports car, and how to envision the future of the brand. Only after this in-depth study could we start designing. This approach allowed us to create something truly original, untainted by preconceived ideas.

One of the tools that inspired us was the use of algorithms. Architects use them to simulate natural growth patterns, such as how plants grow or how trees form. We applied the same concept: we would run the algorithm, analyze the results, and select the most interesting solutions. This method, which today we might call artificial intelligence, was something we were already experimenting with over 15 years ago.

The Pandion’s Aesthetic: A Design Inspired by Nature

For the Pandion’s exterior, we drew inspiration from quartz, creating sharp, razor-like growths and a futuristic, edgy design. For the interior, we turned to the roots of trees, generating organic, almost random shapes that were not dictated by human designers.

The rear of the car, with its intricate lattice of elements, was so complex that it would have been impossible to produce using traditional molding techniques. It was pure sculpture, an unrestrained expression of design.

A Visionary Illuminated Interior

Another unique innovation of the Pandion was its illuminated interior. The seats were made of three layers: a sheet of carbon fiber, an illuminable fabric layer, and a gel layer, with a total thickness of just three centimeters. When the lights were turned on, the cabin glowed in a brilliant, hypnotic pool-blue hue. Amazingly, the film Avatar; which shared a similar aesthetic; came out a year later, but the color felt like a perfect anticipation of its world.

“Transformer” Doors

One of the most spectacular features of the Pandion was its doors. To draw attention at the Geneva Motor Show, we designed a full side-opening system, with doors that extended 3.6 meters high. This meant that, even from a distance, anyone could spot Bertone’s stand simply by seeing those towering open doors.

To make this happen, a complex mechanism was needed: the rear panel had to slide backward to allow the doors to open, which then moved downward in a smooth, robotic motion, reminiscent of Transformers. The workshop engineers, who had worked on the legendary Countach doors, made this extraordinary innovation a reality.

A Special Project

The Pandion was a one-of-a-kind project, full of challenges and innovations. For me, it remains the most exciting car of my career; not only for its design but because it was my first prototype for Bertone and marked the company’s return to the Geneva Motor Show after a two-year absence.

It will always hold a special place in my professional journey and will remain an unforgettable example of the creativity and teamwork that defined that experience.