www.carrozzieri-italiani.com

The ultimate italian coachbuilder site

The Fiat 1100: A Canvas for Creativity

The Fiat 1100 stands as an enduring symbol of Italian automotive excellence, embodying a legacy of innovation and versatility that has captivated generations of enthusiasts. From its inception, this iconic model has transcended mere transportation, emerging as a cornerstone of Italy’s motoring heritage. With its timeless design, remarkable adaptability, and widespread popularity, the Fiat 1100 has left an indelible mark on the automotive landscape, cementing its status as a true classic. Join us as we delve into the rich history and enduring appeal of the Fiat 1100, a vehicle that continues to inspire admiration and fascination to this day.

The record for transformations and modifications certainly goes to the Fiat 600 when considering quantity; however, if the criterion were variety, the title would belong to the 1100. Embedded in its essence as the most widely spread national average car during the golden age of custom bodywork, is the peculiarity of having been used as a base for an incredible multitude of variations, ranging from sporting to professional and specialized uses.

The Era of the "Elaborate"

First and foremost, the Fiat 1100/103 found itself entangled in the world of elaborate customizations: vehicles with fundamentally stock bodies but enhanced finishes and features. This phenomenon flourished between the mid-1950s and the late 1960s, primarily driven by two motivations.

The first motivation stemmed from the increasing ubiquity of automobiles. As cars became more commonplace and standardized, there arose a risk of them appearing impersonal, losing their ability to signify status for their owners. Customization emerged as a solution, with coachbuilders offering personalized touches easily adaptable to individual tastes, typically at prices not exceeding 20% of the standard car’s cost. While the phenomenon primarily affected the Fiat 600 and, to a lesser extent, the Fiat 500, it also extended to the Fiat 1100 and occasionally to more prestigious models like the Appia and Giulietta.

The second motivation revolved around the practicality of readily available vehicles. Many of these coachbuilders secured robust contracts with Fiat, ensuring a supply of vehicles for immediate delivery. This was a significant advantage, considering the average waiting time for a new car often exceeded six months. The trend cut across various sectors, involving not only traditional coachbuilders but also independent repair shops, which had access to a plethora of loose components and pre-packaged kits on the market.

The Pioneers of Customization

Among those who specialized in this sector, Antonio Scioneri stands out. He established a nationwide commercial network, comprising small provincial dealerships, in competition with Fiat’s main dealership network. Other notable players included Canta and Fissore, alongside renowned names like Viotti, Vignale, and even Touring. The renowned Ghia even established a subsidiary, Ghia Serie Speciali, dedicated to producing such customized products, making its debut in 1954 with a Fiat 1100/103. Moretti and Cisitalia also ventured into customization to navigate challenging market conditions, where small manufacturers struggled for space amidst the generosity shown towards coachbuilders.

It’s worth noting that major coachbuilders often used only their own brand for these elaborate customizations, subcontracting specialized work to third-party artisans. In Turin, several such artisans, like Amandonico and Carel, were sought after for their expertise in bringing coachbuilders’ visions to life.

Berlinetta or Coupé?

The Fiat 1100/103 was a versatile platform that found its way into a variety of custom body designs, ranging from sporty coupés to elegant berlinettes. This versatility made it an appealing choice for those seeking a departure from the standard sedan, particularly during a period when Fiat lacked a compact sports car in its lineup.

The absence of a direct competitor and the relatively high positioning of other sports cars made the Fiat 1100 an attractive canvas for customization. Even with the introduction of the Alfa Romeo Giulietta Sprint in 1954, the Fiat derivative remained competitive due to the favorable economics of custom bodywork and tax considerations of the time.

Italian coachbuilders seized the opportunity, offering a diverse array of options to suit various tastes and needs. Pininfarina, for instance, produced four series of custom-bodied 1100 models between 1953 and 1960, catering directly to public demand rather than working on commission from automakers.

Additionally, unique creations emerged, such as an American-inspired station wagon, showcasing the breadth of possibilities offered by the Fiat 1100 platform. Viotti’s 1100 Gran Turismo, introduced in 1956 and available in a “Giardinetta” estate version, further expanded the range of custom options available to Fiat enthusiasts.

Even more indicative of the vitality of coachbuilders is Vignale’s production: in less than five years, they crafted five distinct models based on the 1100/103 and 1200, made in limited series, alongside numerous unique commissions, all resulting from collaborations with Giovanni Michelotti and each possessing its own unique character.

Their journey commenced in 1954 with the “Charmant,” a modest four-seater berlinetta still reflecting post-war design influences. Following this, in 1955, they unveiled the “Mignon,” a sleek and lightweight two-seater, sharing styling cues, albeit with altered proportions, with some contemporary custom Ferraris. By 1956, they introduced the “Desirée,” presenting a more modern and aggressive spacious berlinetta, alongside the “Printemps” catering to a more sports-oriented clientele. Their evolutionary trajectory reached its zenith in 1957 with the “Wonderful,” featuring an even more extravagant and eye-catching design, highlighted by its sophisticated two-tone paint scheme accentuating its distinctive rear fins. Additionally, there were approximately as many models of family cars, a discussion of which will follow later.

Bonhams

For sporty custom bodies, the Fiat 1100 also provided a platform for a short-lived attempt to revive the Cisitalia brand by Carlo Dusio, son of the founder. After returning to Italy following the Argentine venture, he established a new facility in Racconigi with the aim of recreating the success of his father’s company. This involved creating sports cars using mass-produced mechanics, paired with elegant bodywork and refined mechanical enhancements. However, this venture operated on a smaller scale with limited investments and modest ambitions. Despite only six years passing since the introduction of the legendary “202” (and just four since the venture in South America), Italy was rapidly changing.

The post-war era of prosperity was transitioning into an economic boom, theoretically expanding the market space. Nevertheless, competition was fierce, and the new Cisitalia models struggled to distinguish themselves beyond evoking memories of the brand’s racing heritage. The venture began with the introduction of the unique “33 DF Volo Radente” (Derivata Fiat -> Derived from Fiat) at the 1953 Turin Motor Show, a distinctive spider design crafted by the young talent Aldo Brovarone. Subsequent efforts included a limited series of coupés, never quite matching the success of the brand’s 1940s heyday. Similarly, subsequent endeavors with the 1957 “35 DF” and “36 DF” models, equipped with a 1,250 engine sourced from Siata for the former and standard mechanics for the latter, failed to gain significant traction. Ultimately, Cisitalia closed its doors for good in 1964, concluding a slow decline marked by custom bodies derived from the Fiat 600, essentially rebranded Siata cars.

Also Suitable for Racing

Turning our attention back to the Fiat 1100/103, we mustn’t forget its prowess in racing. The class for up to 1100 cc remained prominent, especially in the first half of the 1950s, albeit with a slightly subdued enthusiasm from smaller manufacturers compared to earlier years. While there weren’t artisanal “sports” models based on the 1100/103 – unlike the numerous variants derived from the first generation of the 1100 – the race tracks weren’t exclusively populated by the 1100 TV sedans in the Touring category.

The standout performer among custom-built Gran Turismo models was the “1103” (a fanciful abbreviation of the original name, used to differentiate it from the previous model with a separate chassis) crafted by Zagato. This model even made its mark in Turin, thanks to an unusual collaboration with Siata. The Ambrosini company initially ventured into competitions with a Vignale-bodied coupé (based on the “Charmant”) before turning to Zagato, likely attracted by the lightweight aluminum construction. The outcome was the Siata 1250 GT, featuring a body essentially identical to that of the 1103 and, with engine tweaks, aimed to compete in the higher-displacement class.

On a smaller scale but with more pronounced aesthetic achievements was the collaboration between Bertone and Stanguellini. In 1954, they crafted about ten units of a 1100 Berlinetta characterized by original “fish face”front, echoing the design trends of the time.

Here come the Concept Cars

Amidst a landscape blending the unique, the aspirational dream-car (a concept more familiar in American marketing, yet to fully take root in Italy), and the realm of authentic racing, numerous one-of-a-kind specimens emerged.

One of the most remarkable examples is undoubtedly the Abarth 1100 Sport – a vehicle heavily inspired by aviation, featuring a prominent nose cone at its frontal center, crafted by Ghia in 1953 based on the 1100 TV platform. Another similar specimen emerged, this time based on the Simca 9 1200 (distinguished by its rectangular nose cone). However, these were mere precursors to yet another masterpiece. Following disagreements with his partner, Felice Mario Boano shifted his focus to his own ventures. Alongside his role as a stylist, he owned a bodywork and metalworking workshop, boasting excellent skills in aluminum craftsmanship. The subsequent year saw him reunite with Carlo Abarth, resulting in a trio of aerodynamic cars: the racing spider 207 A (featuring an enlarged 1,270 cc engine), the two-seater spider 208 A, and the coupé 209 A. Despite utilizing only the mechanical components of the 1100/103, expertly modified by the Italo-Austrian preparer, their aluminum bodies, crafted at the Boano Lavorazioni Speciali workshop, were mounted on sheet metal frames designed by Abarth himself. While their sporting achievements were modest, their aesthetic prowess was exceptional, epitomizing the “aeronautical” design ethos of the era. Similarly, the 1200 Spyder America, another singular creation born from the collaboration between Bertone and Stanguellini, was overseen by Franco Scaglione. Renowned for his mastery in aerodynamic design, exemplified by his celebrated Alfa Romeo B.A.T. series, Scaglione delivered yet another remarkable feat.

From Giardinetta's to Special Vehicles

The Fiat 1100, an emblem of post-war Italy’s automotive industry, didn’t just dominate the roads as a standard sedan. Its versatility extended to various specialized iterations, showcasing the ingenuity of both Fiat and independent coachbuilders.

During the reconstruction era, the Fiat 1100’s first generation took center stage, largely due to the innovative concept of “giardinette” – vehicles featuring a unique steel and wood construction. Spearheaded by Mario Revelli di Beaumont and built by Viotti and Fissore, these creations captured the essence of the American automotive style. With the introduction of the 1100/103, wooden structures became obsolete, but their aesthetic influence endured, reminiscent of the Fiat 500 C Belvedere‘s charm.

In 1954, Fiat introduced the 1100/103 Familiare, a rational mass-produced vehicle, signaling a shift in the market. Coachbuilders, unable to compete directly, ventured into specialized designs or elegant customizations. Viotti, the pioneer of the “Giardinetta,” continued its legacy with a refined three-door model, showcasing two distinct series, the latter epitomizing modern styling.

While Viotti led the charge, other coachbuilders experimented with unique and attractive designs. Pininfarina crafted the 1100 TV Sports Wagon in 1954, while Scioneri unveiled the 1100 TV Giardinetta, and Ghia introduced the 1200 Station Wagon with a sliding rear roof for convenience.

Vignale, known for its exuberance, produced models emphasizing capacity, including taxi-centric designs with either a hatchback or a separate trunk. In 1957, they ventured into sportier territory with the “Garden Car,” a three-door variant derived from the “Wonderful” coupé.

For specialized applications, such as ambulance services, the Fiat 1100 became indispensable. Organizations like the Pubbliche Assistenze and the Misericordie relied on variants tailored for their needs. Coachbuilders like Garavini, Savio, Coriasco, Fissore, and Mariani specialized in crafting ambulances, ensuring that even smaller organizations could afford reliable emergency vehicles.

In addition to specialized vehicles, some coachbuilders ventured into utility vehicles, while others produced advertising vehicles. However, as the automotive landscape evolved, companies shifted towards more practical choices for daily transportation, leaving the 1100’s legacy intact but evolving with the times.

Conclusion

The Fiat 1100’s journey from standard sedan to specialized vehicles highlights its adaptability and enduring legacy in Italy’s automotive history. As an emblem of post-war recovery and innovation, it continues to inspire admiration among enthusiasts and historians alike.

Source: Fiat 1100/103 – 70 anni di un fenomeno italiano – Fuoriserie per tutti gli usi e per tutti i gusti (Alessandro Sannia – aisastoryauto.it)

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The BMW M1 holds a unique place in automotive history. As the first production car from BMW’s Motorsport division, the M1 was intended to showcase the company’s engineering prowess and racing pedigree. However, despite its striking looks, impressive performance, and significant impact on the BMW brand, the M1’s journey was fraught with challenges, including financial turmoil, production delays, and regulatory hurdles. Today, the M division has evolved into a symbol of high-performance street cars, but the M1’s legacy remains one of both triumph and failure.

The Birth of BMW Motorsport

In 1972, BMW established its Motorsport Division, known as “M,” with the goal of advancing the brand’s competitive edge in the world of motorsports. Prior to this, BMW’s racing efforts were fragmented, with various teams involved in different categories but lacking a unified structure. This all changed when Bob Lutz, BMW’s head of sales and marketing, spearheaded the formation of BMW Motorsport. The division’s primary mission was to build competitive race cars and elevate the brand’s reputation, particularly in touring car racing.

BMW’s first major success in the motorsport arena came in 1973 with the BMW 3.0 CSL, which dominated the European Touring Car Championship. This victory cemented BMW’s position in the racing world. However, as the division grew, it became apparent that creating race cars from existing production models was unsustainable in the long run. The company needed a purpose-built race car, one that would push the boundaries of performance. This vision led to the creation of the BMW M1, a car that would become a defining symbol for BMW Motorsport.

Michelotti and the BMW Turbo Concept

Alongside the creation of the M division, BMW was developing the BMW Turbo, a concept car that would become a landmark in automotive design and technology. Designed by Paul Bracq, the Turbo E25 introduced bold new features, such as a mid-mounted engine, gullwing doors, and retractable headlights, marking a radical departure from BMW’s previous designs. The car represented a vision of the future, combining performance with cutting-edge safety features, and was intended as a technology showcase for the brand.

Initially, BMW contracted Carrozzeria Michelotti, to assemble the Turbo prototype. Giovanni Michelotti, famous for his work with a variety of automotive brands, established a 10,000-square-meter workshop dedicated to the Turbo project. Michelotti built two BMW Turbo prototypes in total, with one being showcased at the 1972 Frankfurt Motor Show. This partnership underscored BMW’s ambition for the car and its desire to create something truly revolutionary.

However, the timing of the project was unfortunate. The 1973 oil crisis caused a global economic downturn, dramatically increasing fuel prices and severely affecting the automotive industry, particularly for performance cars like the BMW Turbo. The crisis placed enormous financial strain on car manufacturers, and BMW was forced to reconsider its plans, including the costly decision to move forward with the Turbo prototype.

The Fallout and the Shift to Italdesign

As the crisis deepened, BMW was unable to fulfill its contract with Michelotti, and the planned collaboration was put on hold. Financial constraints led the company to reevaluate its spending, and resources allocated to the Turbo project were reduced. Michelotti’s specially built workshop, which had been prepared to assemble the car, remained underutilized as BMW shifted its focus.

However, the end of the oil crisis opened up new possibilities. Italdesign, the renowned design and engineering firm led by Giorgetto Giugiaro, came to BMW’s aid. In the years following the crisis, Italdesign purchased Michelotti’s workshop, which would become the production base for the BMW M1. Giugiaro’s expertise in design and engineering played a pivotal role in transforming BMW’s ambitious race car project into a road-going reality.

Giugiaro’s task was to refine the BMW Turbo E25 concept into a production car that could both meet the demands of motorsport and appeal to the consumer market. His design for the M1 retained the sharp, angular lines and futuristic profile of the Turbo, but with refined proportions to suit both racing needs and road-going practicality. The M1’s mid-engine layout, wide stance, and low roofline emphasized its racing pedigree, while its aggressive, sleek design ensured it would stand out as a supercar.

A Race Car for the Road

The BMW M1 was originally conceived as a Group 5 race car, competing against purpose-built machines like the Porsche 935. The project aimed to blend motorsport engineering with production cars, creating a race-bred vehicle that could also be sold to the public. To achieve this, BMW enlisted Lamborghini, to help with the development of the M1. Despite Lamborghini’s expertise in high-performance road cars, it lacked experience in motorsport, which ultimately led to complications during the project.

In the early stages, Lamborghini was tasked with developing the chassis and body of the M1, while BMW would provide the engine. However, Lamborghini’s financial troubles soon became apparent. The company was experiencing significant cash flow issues, and it ultimately misappropriated funds intended for the M1 project. In a dramatic turn of events, BMW was forced to reclaim the project’s components and tooling from Lamborghini, a move that involved a late-night raid to retrieve the M1’s parts. This disruption delayed the project and ultimately led BMW to take full control of the M1’s development.

The Engineering Challenges

Despite the setbacks, the M1 took shape as a highly capable performance car. The vehicle was powered by the M88 engine, a 3.5-liter, straight-six unit that produced 277 horsepower in its road-going form. This engine, derived from the racing program, provided the M1 with impressive performance, allowing it to rival other supercars of the era, such as the Lamborghini Countach and Ferrari 512 BB.

The M1 featured a mid-engine layout, which contributed to its excellent handling characteristics. The car’s design was primarily focused on its racing capabilities, making it relatively raw and unrefined for a road car. It lacked amenities such as power steering, and the cockpit was cramped, with the steering wheel offset to the right to accommodate the center-mounted engine. Despite these compromises, the M1’s performance on the road was outstanding, with acceleration and handling that earned it widespread praise from automotive journalists.

The Racing Struggles and ProCar Series

One of the most significant challenges the M1 faced was its inability to compete in mainstream racing. To homologate the M1 for Group 5 racing, BMW needed to produce 400 road cars. However, production delays meant that only 200 units were built in the first two years, preventing the car from racing in most major events.

In response, BMW created the ProCar Series, a one-make racing championship exclusively for the M1. The ProCar Series was unique in that it featured Formula One drivers competing against privateer M1 owners, creating an exciting spectacle at Formula One race weekends. Although the series generated interest and the M1 proved competitive in this setting, it was not enough to elevate the car into mainstream motorsport. Furthermore, the M1’s performance in ProCar did little to resolve its commercial issues.

Commercial Challenges and Production Woes

The M1 was also a commercial disappointment. Originally, BMW had intended to sell the M1 for around 100,000 Deutsche Marks, placing it in direct competition with supercars like the Lamborghini Countach. However, due to the disruptions caused by Lamborghini’s financial troubles and the increased cost of production, the M1’s price climbed to 113,000 Deutsche Marks. Even with this increase, the car was difficult to sell. BMW was only able to produce 399 M1s, well below the original goal of 1,000 units, making it a rare and expensive model.

Despite its high performance and exotic status, the M1 was a hard sell. Its design was too closely aligned with its racing origins, and its lack of creature comforts and high price point made it less appealing to the typical supercar buyer. Additionally, the car’s raw nature, with its lack of power steering and awkward driving position, alienated many potential customers. In the end, the M1’s commercial failure contributed to its relatively low production numbers and limited legacy as a production car.

Legacy and the Evolution of the M Division

Although the M1 was a commercial and racing disappointment, it laid the foundation for the success of BMW’s Motorsport division. The lessons learned from the M1 project helped shape future BMW M cars, starting with the iconic E30 M3. The E30 M3, developed as a more practical and accessible performance car, became a massive success in both motorsport and sales, marking the beginning of a new era for BMW M.

The M1 also solidified the link between BMW’s racing heritage and its high-performance street cars. Today, the M badge is synonymous with powerful, driver-focused vehicles, but it all traces back to the M1. The M1’s legacy is less about its financial success and more about its role in shaping the identity of BMW M as a division dedicated to performance engineering and motorsport excellence.

Conclusion

The BMW M1’s story is one of ambition, innovation, and hard lessons learned. It was a car ahead of its time, a race car designed for the road, and a symbol of BMW’s commitment to motorsport. While it never reached the commercial success BMW had hoped for, it played a crucial role in the development of the M division and set the stage for future performance cars. The M1 may not have been the financial success BMW wanted, but its influence on the brand and its impact on the automotive world cannot be overstated. Today, the M1 remains a revered classic, a testament to BMW’s racing heritage and the trials and triumphs of the M division.