www.carrozzieri-italiani.com

The ultimate italian coachbuilder site

The Tank Style by Stabilimenti Farina

Tank Style Stabilimenti Farina

The aftermath of World War II ushered in a period of rebirth and reconstruction, not only for nations but also for the automotive industry. In the heart of this post-war era, the 1946 Lausanne Fashion Show in Switzerland emerged as a unique convergence of Italian cars and fashion, offering a glimpse into the evolving landscape of design and innovation. This event, held from 5th to 6th October, marked a pivotal moment for Italian coachbuilders which, eager to break free from the shackles of wartime constraints, showcased their creations.

The 1946 Lausanne Fashion Show

In the wake of the war, the design evolution of automobiles had come to a standstill, prompting Italian coachbuilders to push the boundaries of creativity and craftsmanship. The shores of Lake Geneva witnessed a spectacle where the fusion of automotive ingenuity and high fashion unfolded. This gathering served as a prelude to the upcoming “Mostra delle Carrozzerie Italiane,” the first-ever post-war Italian auto show, laying the groundwork for the future of automotive design.

Italian coachbuilders, renowned for their artistry, presented a captivating array of automobiles at the Lausanne Fashion Show, each bearing the distinct mark of experimentation.

Among the illustrious names present at the event were Bertone, Pininfarina, Ghia, Touring, and Monviso, each showcasing their interpretations of automotive beauty and luxury. The exhibition hall by the shores of Lake Geneva bore witness to a dazzling array of automobiles, with special models meticulously crafted for the occasion.

Bertone, renowned for its avant-garde approach to design, captured the imagination of onlookers with a Spider based on the Fiat 1100 and a cabriolet derived from the elegant Lancia Aprilia. Meanwhile, Pininfarina, a stalwart of Italian automotive design, presented their own interpretation of the Lancia Aprilia, alongside an Alfa Romeo 6C 2500 cabriolet.

Ghia, known for its opulent creations, showcased an Alfa Romeo 6C sedan, while Touring wowed attendees with a sleek 6C 2500 coupé. Monviso, a name less familiar, unveiled a Fiat 1100 Stella Alpina, adding its own unique flair to the proceedings.

However, it was a particular design that stole the spotlight at the Lausanne Fashion Show: With Giovanni Michelotti at the helm, Stabilimenti Farina introduced the Lancia Aprilia Tank Style: a vehicle that would mesmerize audiences and shape automotive design for generations.

Tank Style Unveiled: Stabilimenti Farina's Avant-Garde Oddity

As the curtain rose on Stabilimenti Farina’s showcase at the 1946 Lausanne Fashion Show, attendees were met with a display that defied convention and challenged the boundaries of automotive aesthetics. Stabilimenti Farina, already celebrated for their bespoke creations, unveiled two groundbreaking models: the monolithic coupé and the avant-garde spider, both based on the Lancia Aprilia and collectively known as the Tank-Style cars.

These vehicles, characterized by their squat and low-slung profiles, represented a bold departure from the conventional norms of automotive design, challenging the boundaries of innovation in a post-war era ripe for change. The coupé, distinguished by its remarkably low roofline and covered wheel arches reminiscent of the Flamboyant models, created an illusion of a floating monolith, further cementing the Tank Style’s avant-garde allure.

The Tank-Style concept was replicated in subsequent cabriolets, as well as a saloon and a coupé, transforming what was initially perceived as a one-off creation into a series of remarkable automobiles. Stabilimenti Farina had inadvertently birthed an alternative to the flamboyant style championed by Ghia, but the differences were stark.

While the Flamboyant creations often exuded opulence and decorative extravagance, the Tank-Style cars took a more restrained yet captivating approach. The sides of these vehicles maintained a low, smooth profile, devoid of excessive ornamentation. However, the real spectacle lay at the front, where a large pointed grille and recessed headlights inside transparent panels commanded attention.

Concealed behind glass, the headlights departed from conventional norms, signaling a departure from tradition. Instead, the Tank-Style cars appeared to blend influences from European artistic movements such as Art Deco and Cubism. The outcome was a surprising amalgamation of daring shapes and angles, forging a visual language that surpassed conventional automotive design boundaries.

Yet, even with its departure from conventional beauty standards, the Tank-Style cars held their ground, challenging the notion that a car had to be traditionally beautiful to be marketable. The high build quality characteristic of Stabilimenti Farina’s bespoke creations served as a counterbalance, reassuring buyers of the craftsmanship behind the avant-garde design.

Introducing yet another dimension of fascination, the Tank-Style cars embraced a personal flair, evoking nods to Greek mythology and Apollonian minimalism. The stylized grille at the front hinted at an archaeo-futuristic portrayal of a Greek helmet. Additionally, the grille’s sculpted front bore a resemblance to the “Cowcatcher” found on steam locomotives: a protective shield designed to prevent objects on the tracks from causing derailment.

Fading Echoes: The Decline and Evolution of the Tank Style

The Lancia Aprilia Tank Style by Stabilimenti Farina, designed by Giovanni Michelotti, emerged as more than just an automotive creation; it was a testament to the boundless creativity of the post-war era, where experimentation and visionary design flourished against the backdrop of recovery and renewal.

The Tank-Style cars, born out of the fertile ground of post-war experimentation, saw their last manifestation in 1947 when a sedan version was put into production in limited series. This marked the culmination of Stabilimenti Farina’s venture into the avant-garde, encapsulating the essence of a design era that embraced innovation and unbridled creativity. Yet, the Tank Style’s influence persisted, subtly woven into the fabric of future projects by the Italian coachbuilder.

The Lancia Aprilia Berlina Gran Lusso, a final ode to the Tank Style, echoed the unique aesthetic of its predecessors. However, it also signaled the end of an era, as Stabilimenti Farina gradually shifted its design philosophy. The Tank Style had left an indelible mark, its influence subtly weaving its way into subsequent creations by the Italian coachbuilder.

In the years following, the distinctive front-end design of the Tank Style found its way into other Stabilimenti Farina projects. Notably, the grill of the Fiat 1100 Cabriolet and the Alfa Romeo 6C Coupé and Cabriolet Victoria and Cabriolet Extralusso carried the remnants of the Tank Style’s impact. Though slightly less pronounced, the echoes of the avant-garde aesthetic persisted, serving as a testament to the enduring legacy of a design that dared to defy convention.

However, as time progressed, the Tank Style gradually faded into the background. Stabilimenti Farina, perhaps recognizing the need for a more conventional approach in the ever-evolving automotive landscape, dismissed the avant-garde style that had once captivated audiences.

Conclusions

The Lancia Aprilia Tank Style by Stabilimenti Farina, designed by Michelotti, stands as a testament to a unique moment in automotive history. The Tank-Style cars, with their unconventional and audacious design, not only challenged the norms of their time but also left an indelible mark on subsequent creations. While the Tank Style itself was eventually retired, its influence lingered, serving as a reminder of a bygone era where post-war creativity and experimentation knew no bounds. The avant-garde spirit embodied by Stabilimenti Farina’s Tank Style remains etched in the annals of automotive design, a symbol of a time when the industry dared to dream beyond convention.

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The BMW M1 holds a unique place in automotive history. As the first production car from BMW’s Motorsport division, the M1 was intended to showcase the company’s engineering prowess and racing pedigree. However, despite its striking looks, impressive performance, and significant impact on the BMW brand, the M1’s journey was fraught with challenges, including financial turmoil, production delays, and regulatory hurdles. Today, the M division has evolved into a symbol of high-performance street cars, but the M1’s legacy remains one of both triumph and failure.

The Birth of BMW Motorsport

In 1972, BMW established its Motorsport Division, known as “M,” with the goal of advancing the brand’s competitive edge in the world of motorsports. Prior to this, BMW’s racing efforts were fragmented, with various teams involved in different categories but lacking a unified structure. This all changed when Bob Lutz, BMW’s head of sales and marketing, spearheaded the formation of BMW Motorsport. The division’s primary mission was to build competitive race cars and elevate the brand’s reputation, particularly in touring car racing.

BMW’s first major success in the motorsport arena came in 1973 with the BMW 3.0 CSL, which dominated the European Touring Car Championship. This victory cemented BMW’s position in the racing world. However, as the division grew, it became apparent that creating race cars from existing production models was unsustainable in the long run. The company needed a purpose-built race car, one that would push the boundaries of performance. This vision led to the creation of the BMW M1, a car that would become a defining symbol for BMW Motorsport.

Michelotti and the BMW Turbo Concept

Alongside the creation of the M division, BMW was developing the BMW Turbo, a concept car that would become a landmark in automotive design and technology. Designed by Paul Bracq, the Turbo E25 introduced bold new features, such as a mid-mounted engine, gullwing doors, and retractable headlights, marking a radical departure from BMW’s previous designs. The car represented a vision of the future, combining performance with cutting-edge safety features, and was intended as a technology showcase for the brand.

Initially, BMW contracted Carrozzeria Michelotti, to assemble the Turbo prototype. Giovanni Michelotti, famous for his work with a variety of automotive brands, established a 10,000-square-meter workshop dedicated to the Turbo project. Michelotti built two BMW Turbo prototypes in total, with one being showcased at the 1972 Frankfurt Motor Show. This partnership underscored BMW’s ambition for the car and its desire to create something truly revolutionary.

However, the timing of the project was unfortunate. The 1973 oil crisis caused a global economic downturn, dramatically increasing fuel prices and severely affecting the automotive industry, particularly for performance cars like the BMW Turbo. The crisis placed enormous financial strain on car manufacturers, and BMW was forced to reconsider its plans, including the costly decision to move forward with the Turbo prototype.

The Fallout and the Shift to Italdesign

As the crisis deepened, BMW was unable to fulfill its contract with Michelotti, and the planned collaboration was put on hold. Financial constraints led the company to reevaluate its spending, and resources allocated to the Turbo project were reduced. Michelotti’s specially built workshop, which had been prepared to assemble the car, remained underutilized as BMW shifted its focus.

However, the end of the oil crisis opened up new possibilities. Italdesign, the renowned design and engineering firm led by Giorgetto Giugiaro, came to BMW’s aid. In the years following the crisis, Italdesign purchased Michelotti’s workshop, which would become the production base for the BMW M1. Giugiaro’s expertise in design and engineering played a pivotal role in transforming BMW’s ambitious race car project into a road-going reality.

Giugiaro’s task was to refine the BMW Turbo E25 concept into a production car that could both meet the demands of motorsport and appeal to the consumer market. His design for the M1 retained the sharp, angular lines and futuristic profile of the Turbo, but with refined proportions to suit both racing needs and road-going practicality. The M1’s mid-engine layout, wide stance, and low roofline emphasized its racing pedigree, while its aggressive, sleek design ensured it would stand out as a supercar.

A Race Car for the Road

The BMW M1 was originally conceived as a Group 5 race car, competing against purpose-built machines like the Porsche 935. The project aimed to blend motorsport engineering with production cars, creating a race-bred vehicle that could also be sold to the public. To achieve this, BMW enlisted Lamborghini, to help with the development of the M1. Despite Lamborghini’s expertise in high-performance road cars, it lacked experience in motorsport, which ultimately led to complications during the project.

In the early stages, Lamborghini was tasked with developing the chassis and body of the M1, while BMW would provide the engine. However, Lamborghini’s financial troubles soon became apparent. The company was experiencing significant cash flow issues, and it ultimately misappropriated funds intended for the M1 project. In a dramatic turn of events, BMW was forced to reclaim the project’s components and tooling from Lamborghini, a move that involved a late-night raid to retrieve the M1’s parts. This disruption delayed the project and ultimately led BMW to take full control of the M1’s development.

The Engineering Challenges

Despite the setbacks, the M1 took shape as a highly capable performance car. The vehicle was powered by the M88 engine, a 3.5-liter, straight-six unit that produced 277 horsepower in its road-going form. This engine, derived from the racing program, provided the M1 with impressive performance, allowing it to rival other supercars of the era, such as the Lamborghini Countach and Ferrari 512 BB.

The M1 featured a mid-engine layout, which contributed to its excellent handling characteristics. The car’s design was primarily focused on its racing capabilities, making it relatively raw and unrefined for a road car. It lacked amenities such as power steering, and the cockpit was cramped, with the steering wheel offset to the right to accommodate the center-mounted engine. Despite these compromises, the M1’s performance on the road was outstanding, with acceleration and handling that earned it widespread praise from automotive journalists.

The Racing Struggles and ProCar Series

One of the most significant challenges the M1 faced was its inability to compete in mainstream racing. To homologate the M1 for Group 5 racing, BMW needed to produce 400 road cars. However, production delays meant that only 200 units were built in the first two years, preventing the car from racing in most major events.

In response, BMW created the ProCar Series, a one-make racing championship exclusively for the M1. The ProCar Series was unique in that it featured Formula One drivers competing against privateer M1 owners, creating an exciting spectacle at Formula One race weekends. Although the series generated interest and the M1 proved competitive in this setting, it was not enough to elevate the car into mainstream motorsport. Furthermore, the M1’s performance in ProCar did little to resolve its commercial issues.

Commercial Challenges and Production Woes

The M1 was also a commercial disappointment. Originally, BMW had intended to sell the M1 for around 100,000 Deutsche Marks, placing it in direct competition with supercars like the Lamborghini Countach. However, due to the disruptions caused by Lamborghini’s financial troubles and the increased cost of production, the M1’s price climbed to 113,000 Deutsche Marks. Even with this increase, the car was difficult to sell. BMW was only able to produce 399 M1s, well below the original goal of 1,000 units, making it a rare and expensive model.

Despite its high performance and exotic status, the M1 was a hard sell. Its design was too closely aligned with its racing origins, and its lack of creature comforts and high price point made it less appealing to the typical supercar buyer. Additionally, the car’s raw nature, with its lack of power steering and awkward driving position, alienated many potential customers. In the end, the M1’s commercial failure contributed to its relatively low production numbers and limited legacy as a production car.

Legacy and the Evolution of the M Division

Although the M1 was a commercial and racing disappointment, it laid the foundation for the success of BMW’s Motorsport division. The lessons learned from the M1 project helped shape future BMW M cars, starting with the iconic E30 M3. The E30 M3, developed as a more practical and accessible performance car, became a massive success in both motorsport and sales, marking the beginning of a new era for BMW M.

The M1 also solidified the link between BMW’s racing heritage and its high-performance street cars. Today, the M badge is synonymous with powerful, driver-focused vehicles, but it all traces back to the M1. The M1’s legacy is less about its financial success and more about its role in shaping the identity of BMW M as a division dedicated to performance engineering and motorsport excellence.

Conclusion

The BMW M1’s story is one of ambition, innovation, and hard lessons learned. It was a car ahead of its time, a race car designed for the road, and a symbol of BMW’s commitment to motorsport. While it never reached the commercial success BMW had hoped for, it played a crucial role in the development of the M division and set the stage for future performance cars. The M1 may not have been the financial success BMW wanted, but its influence on the brand and its impact on the automotive world cannot be overstated. Today, the M1 remains a revered classic, a testament to BMW’s racing heritage and the trials and triumphs of the M division.